Case study · Structural validation

Gooseneck TrailerChassis Static FEA

Static structural assessment of an OEM supplied trailer chassis, with load application, mesh refinement and documented results supporting the design release.

Sector
Commercial trailers
Service
Structural and stress FEA
Focus
Static payload case
CAD model of the supplied gooseneck trailer chassis.
OEM supplied chassis geometry used as the basis for the static structural assessment.
Objective
Provide design release evidence
Method
Static structural FEA
Boundary
OEM retained chassis design
Outcome
Validation report delivered
01 Validation brief

Assess the design the OEM supplied

Fabrixon’s scope was structural validation rather than chassis redesign. The OEM retained the customer specification, chassis design, fabrication and eventual certification submission.

Load distribution, material specification and support assumptions were reviewed before analysis. The report needed to make those inputs traceable so the OEM could interpret the stress and displacement results within the stated load case.

Structure
40 ft gooseneck trailer chassis supplied by the OEM.
Payload
40,000 lb design payload with the distribution defined by the OEM.
Assessment
Static linear FEA in ANSYS Mechanical against the stated 250 MPa material yield reference.
Release package
Document model assumptions, convergence work, stress results and displacement output for engineering review.
02 Analysis discipline

Build credibility into the model

Shell representation was used where appropriate, with solid regions where local behaviour required more detail. Mesh refinement focused on the gooseneck transition, attachments and other geometric concentrations.

  1. 01

    Prepare

    Import the chassis and retain geometry that governs the structural load path.

  2. 02

    Apply

    Use the specified payload distribution and the agreed coupling and suspension reactions.

  3. 03

    Refine

    Reduce local element size until results stabilise within the project convergence tolerance.

  4. 04

    Report

    Record the material basis, mesh checks, peak stress and displacement interpretation.

Meshed gooseneck trailer chassis model showing applied loads and support conditions.
Analysis model showing the meshed chassis, applied load locations and support constraints used for the static payload case.
03 Reported static result

A margin within the stated case

The reported converged peak was below the material yield value used in the model. These figures describe the supplied static payload case; they are not a road durability or fatigue rating.

Static result summary
ResultValueInterpretation
Peak von Mises stress59 MPaRounded converged peak
Stress relative to yield24%Of the stated 250 MPa material yield
Implied yield ratio4.2For this static load case
Maximum displacement0.39 mmReported URES peak for the modelled case
Displayed FOS floor6.36Lowest mapped value shown on the presented factor of safety plot

The material reference was ASTM A36 with the stated yield value used in the model. Stress is rounded for presentation; the result is bounded by the specified static load distribution.

04 Use of the evidence

Static validation is a bounded scope

The report supported the OEM’s design release using a specified payload case. Its scope boundary matters as much as the headline stress result.

Included in this assessment

Static load application, support assumptions, stress and deformation assessment, mesh refinement and documentation of the analysis basis.

Not established by this result

Road shock response, peak dynamic suspension reactions and fatigue performance under service history. These remain separate analyses from this static assessment.

05 Engineering outcome

A documented basis for release

The validation report was delivered on schedule and the chassis was released for fabrication. Fabrixon remained available to clarify assumptions and analysis scope during the release process.

Responsibility
Fabrixon supplied analysis evidence; the OEM retained design ownership, manufacture and certification.
Traceability
The report recorded the model, specified loads, material references and mesh refinement approach.
Scope recorded
Static evidence supported the release review, while dynamic loading and fatigue were identified as separate assessment scopes.

Talk to an Engineer

Discuss Your Structural FEA Project

Share the chassis geometry, load case and review requirements. An engineer can confirm the most suitable structural validation and reporting scope.

Engineering enquiryTell us what you need to engineer

The enquiry form is temporarily unavailable.